Meet the Team
You will have already met with your supervisors and understand that their primary role is to offer you guidance and support in your studies.
Your Research Director and research area administrator are also available for you, should you require any additional support.
Your PhD Researcher Representative is Ferrari Cassidy and she will represent your UoA on University level committees to ensure that your voice is heard and any concerns raised.
PhD Researchers within this unit are formally registered at Coleraine campus. The Head of the Doctoral College at Magee and Coleraine is Professor Alison Gallagher.
Our Faculty Subject Librarian for is Janice McQuilkin.
Research Ethics and Integrity
Before you commence any data collection involving human participants you will need to ascertain under which category of research you need to seek approval and follow the relevant process (detailed on the Ethics For Applicants section of the Research Governance webpages.
Please note that this must be completed for any study involving data collection with human participants (i.e., if you plan to hold interviews, conduct surveys, focus groups, observation etc.). The process involved in obtaining Research Ethics clearance is shown below:
- The completed form for Research Ethics clearance should be completed at least two months in advance of when you plan to collect data. This is normally completed in collaboration with your supervisors, who will give advice if changes are needed.
- When an agreed form is produced the supervisor sends a copy and other relevant materials (e.g. information sheets, consent forms, interview questions etc.) to the Chair of the Communication and Media Committee Ethics Committee (Dr Anne Moorhead).
- The Communication and Media Research Ethics committee will then review the ethics application and communicate to the Chair of the supervisory panel and the researcher involved if there are any possible ethical issues with the planned research approach. A Communication and Media Research Ethics Filter Committee meeting is held once a month to consider applications.
- The researcher is advised if any changes are needed and given the opportunity to revise and resubmit the application. These are then reconsidered by Research Ethics Committee and normally Research Ethics permission is granted.
Working Environment
Desk space is available across all campuses at UU (depending on projects and supervisory team). Computers are available for research writing and web–based research. More specialist facilities are also available on request, including an Apple iMac for high–end video production/post–production (with particular reference to practice research).
It should be noted that space is limited on the Belfast campus and the room we have been allocated has 12 desks – room BC-04-226 - for full-time researchers. As a consequence of this limited space researchers may be required to share desk space at certain times and hence, we are operating a ‘clean desk’ policy where researchers should not leave their possessions on any desk but should use lockers provided to store equipment and personal belongings.
In order to support our internationally excellent and world leading research PhD candidates will have access to a range of high-end production facilities and industry level equipment. PhD Researchers have access to both broadcast and black box television studios across the campuses, industry standard production equipment for film and televisual content (4K cameras, field recorders, lighting kits, outside broadcast equipment), immersive content (high spec edit suites, 360 cameras, VR Headsets), audio (sound studios, portable audio recording equipment) and access to high end edit and production computer equipment as well as the full Adobe CC suite.
It is expected that all PhDs will make a contribution to the research community through regular attendance on campus at research seminars, presenting at PhD-led seminars and other events, and also through their engagement with their peers around training events, in addition to engagement with supervision meetings.
It is important that you have regular contact with your supervisors. The University requires that full-time funded PhD researchers will attend the campus regularly (at least twice a week) unless there is agreement which allows for more flexibility with supervisors. Clearly the recent experience of the Covid pandemic has altered working patterns for many of us and we have become more open to working more flexibly. Given this I would expect you to find a working pattern that works optimally for yourself and your supervisors.
It is anticipated that initially you will need to have relatively frequent supervisory meetings. However, when you settle into a more familiar pattern of work, meetings may become less frequent although at various times you may need more support (approaching assessments or during the final writing up stage). The actual supervisory procedure and systems adopted should be agreed by yourself and your supervisors, but for clarification the Centre for Communication, Media, and Cultural Studies would expect that full time PhD researchers should have substantive meetings with their supervisors at least once a month and that part-time PhD researchers at least once during a three-month period. The PhD Manager system allows uploading of digital records of supervisory meetings, and it is the responsibility of the PhD researcher to ensure that a full record of meetings is held.
Digital Services provide information on how to print including how to access multifunction devices (MFD) that will allow you to print, copy and scan documents. More information can be found on their website.
Health and Safety
Office Safety
It is everyone’s duty to ensure a safe working environment. Your first point of contact if you have a health and safety query should be your supervisor.
Risk assessments are carried out and updated annually.
First Aid/Defibrillators are available from Security on each campus (extension 22222).
The First Aid contact on the Coleraine Campus is Dr Colm Murphy.
In event of an emergency requiring Police, Fire or Ambulance dial (9)999 directly then contact Security immediately. If working late you should make security aware and let them know when you leave.
Fire Safety
If you discover a fire, you should follow the Fire Safety procedures and activate the alarm immediately using nearest break glass point.
The School of Communication and Media has two Fire Wardens:
- Belfast – Gail Hanlon
- Coleraine – Jude Mullan
Travel and Procurement Procedures
All DfE-funded and VCRS PhD researchers are awarded a budget each year (around £900) to be spent on developmental activities to support their research (for instance a training event, attending a conference, collecting data). Prior approval for all DfE/VCRS expenditure must be obtained from the Research Director. The following steps must be followed:
- As early as possible in advance of a trip or the date of expenditure (at least 3 weeks beforehand), an email must be sent to the Research Director justifying the expenditure and pointing out its relevance to the researcher’s research project.
- Following approval of the spend, PhD researchers process the Prior Approvals and Reimbursed Expense Claims online. PhD researchers should navigate to the Finance Visitors Page and follow the link to the ‘Digital Claims Portal’. The Portal homepage provides a link to Registration instructions for first time visitors.
- Once Registration is complete, PhD researchers can maintain their profile and submit digital requests. Training Guides for each claim type are available on the Portal Homepage.
- When completing the ‘Claim Details’ section, PhD researchers are encouraged to consult with School Office staff Sarah Gillen to ensure the correct ‘Directorate’ & ‘Department’ values are selected from the dropdown lists presented on the digital forms. This will ensure your request is processed in a timely manner.
If any technical problems are encountered, users should raise a ticket via the ServiceDesk.
Following trips, expenses incurred should be submitted via the Digital Claims Portal.
Please note: Claims for expenditure will only be processed if a prior approval form has been submitted in advance of the trip (and a prior approval number has been received) and if receipts for expenditure are submitted as part of the claim. Researchers funded from other sources may seek funding, though there is no guarantee that the request will be met. In this case, prior approval for all such expenditure must be obtained from the Research Director.
Air travel must always be booked using the University’s approved travel agent – Selective Travel. Before booking, Selective Travel will require a prior approval number and a cost centre code (you must contact the secretary for the cost centre code). For low cost airline travel (e.g. Easyjet, Ryanair etc.), Selective Travel will require this to be booked via their website – please provide your trip details to the research area administrator who will advise on online booking issues.
Conference fees may be paid in advance to the conference organisers through the University Finance Department. Please provide a copy of the conference registration form and payment details, along with your prior approval number, to the Finance Department.
Car mileage for research trips may be claimed using the Digital Claims Portal.
Accommodation expenses are normally reimbursed after the trip, though it may be possible to book hotel accommodation in advance of a trip through the University’s travel agent (Selective Travel).
- It is expected that the most economical forms of travel should be used whenever possible (e.g. public transport rather than taxis).
- Claim forms for expenses must be submitted within 2 months of the date of the trip.
Demonstrating and Teaching Opportunities
It is beneficial from a career development point of view for PhD researchers to obtain some teaching experience during their period of study.
The opportunities for teaching will depend to a great extent on the teaching needs within the School of Communication and Media at any given time and PhD researchers’ area of expertise.
All PhD researchers will be asked to record their areas of teaching interest with the Research Director and these details will be forwarded to Heads of Departments for consideration, should any teaching opportunities arise.
Please note:
- Teaching allocations are at the discretion of Heads of Department and not the Research Director.
- Full-time funded PhD researchers may only teach a maximum of 6 hours per week.
- Teaching would involve mostly seminars and to a lesser extent lecturing.
- Where PhD researchers have been offered teaching, it would be expected that they are provided with teaching support materials where possible.
Assessment Seminars
Progress is monitored through a series of assessment reports submitted by the PhD researcher which are supported by follow up presentations. Two major assessments are carried out during the first 12 months of study for full-time and the first 24 months for part-time researchers.
For full-time researchers the first assessment, known as the Initial Assessment, ordinarily takes place not more than four months after the researcher has first registered. For example, for those registering in September, assessments normally take place during January. The second assessment, known as the Confirmation Assessment, happens 9-10 months into the study (normally in June). For part-time researchers the Initial Assessment is usually arranged for 9-10 months after first registration. For example, for those registering in September, initial assessments will normally happen in the June assessment period.
For both initial and confirmation assessments researchers are expected to present their work (written report and oral presentation) to be assessed by a panel of research active staff. The panel make recommendations about the direction, organisation or other aspects of the research and report back to the Research Director and supervisory panel on researcher progress.
At the assessment meetings there is a chairperson (normally the Research Director) and up to two examiners (usually one from the researcher’s ‘home’ School and one from another Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences School). The supervisors attend the assessment meetings but do not answer questions.
The Initial Assessment meeting normally lasts around one and half hours and the Confirmation Assessment around two hours. There are three main elements to the assessment meetings:
- Researcher presentation
- Questions from the panel on the presentation and submitted written material
- Feedback from the panel on your progress.
It is essential that the panel have enough time to read the written report and researchers are expected to submit through the PhD Manager system at least two weeks prior to the assessment event (i.e. for the September intake, by early January). Those presenting in June should submit their written reports by the end of May. Researchers should ensure that sources are referenced correctly and that the reports are free of plagiarism. The written reports will be checked for plagiarism through the Turnitin.
In the Initial Assessment the PhD researcher is required to illustrate how they have advanced their work from application and proposal stage. They should provide a comprehensive description of the proposed programme of work and illustrate that an initial wide-ranging review of the literature has been carried out. At this stage there should clearly be some awareness of the types of methodologies available to carry out the research. The initial assessment report should be developed in close co-operation with supervisors.
In terms of the submission, two things are required:
- Power-point presentation to a subject panel and peers (20 mins). In your PowerPoint, you need to address the following:
- Overarching themes/key research questions
- Key Literature/Disciplinary Context
- Key Methods/Methodological Issues
- Evidence of refinement and development of the project since registration
- Originality/Contribution to knowledge
- Annotated bibliography (between 1000 and 2000 words). In the annotated bibliography you need to provide a compelling rationale for the choices you've made regarding key sources.
After the presentation the members of the panel will ask questions and seek clarification on key issues arising from the presentation (normally around 20 minutes). They may also offer suggestions on how the study could be improved or developed. The purpose of this assessment is not only to monitor researcher progress but also to offer advice, support, and constructive feedback. After the panel has deliberated on the presentation, report and Q&A session, the chair will communicate the decision – to either proceed to the next stage of the PhD or to resubmit the report and present again.
It should be noted that at the Initial Assessment presentation, new PhD researchers may present to their peers. Other new and existing PhD researchers are normally invited to attend presentations (attendance will only be allowed for the presentation and questions part and not for the panel feedback element at the end of the meeting). This practice has been approved by the Doctoral College and is seen as good practice as it helps to develop a stronger PhD research community allowing new PhD researchers to gain experience of presenting to peers.
The Confirmation assessment is an important assessment for all researchers as it marks the confirmation of the PhD project and PhD researcher. The main purpose of this assessment is to provide assurance to supervisors, the assessment panel and to the Research Director that the topic of the PhD is now clearly defined and well understood and that the scope of the study is appropriate to PhD level (i.e., not more suitable for MPhil or too ambitious and unlikely to be completed in time).
At this stage it would be expected that the candidate will have considered a suitable methodology that it is appropriate for the study and will ensure its successful completion. It is also expected that a viable and realistic plan for progress over the next two years is presented at this assessment. In both the written report and oral presentation, the panel will want to see evidence that a substantial amount of progress has been made since the initial assessment and consideration will be given to the extent to which earlier comments have been addressed.
Three things are required:
- Power-point presentation detailing progress to a subject panel and peers (25-30 mins)
- Progress report (between 2000 to 2500 words). This report will detail your work under the following headings:
- A thorough background to the area that identifies overarching themes and the key research questions.
- A critical literature review illustrating the key gaps in knowledge surrounding the area of study.
- A discussion of the proposed research methodology and strategy for data collection. This will involve giving details of its rationale and how it may be operationalized.
- Evidence of clear refinement and substantive development of the project since registration.
- A timetable for the completion of the study within the given time frame (i.e. three years for a full-time PhD researcher or up to six years for part-time.
- Draft chapter or some other significant sample of written work (8000 to 10000 words).
The Power-point presentation should last between 25-30 minutes. It is acknowledged that there is a relatively short word limit for the progress report, but the panel will be interested in the key elements as noted above and they do not need to see everything that has been written to date.
At the presentation they will ask questions and seek clarification on key issues linked to the study and will normally make recommendations about the direction, organisation and other aspects of the work. It is important that these comments are considered with your supervisors.
The outcome of the confirmation can result in several decisions 1) a straightforward confirmation, 2) confirmation with recommendations or 3) deferral (i.e., repeating the assessment within a specified period), 4) recommendation to transfer to an MPhil or 5) withdrawal from the programme. You will be given oral feedback directly after the meeting and written feedback on behalf of the panel is posted on PhD manager within a few days of the assessment. This feedback is considered by the Research Director before the researcher is formally transferred/confirmed.
Please remember that for the initial and confirmation assessments researchers are required to submit their written reports through the PhD Manager system at least two weeks in advance of the meeting date. If, for any reason, you cannot meet the deadlines set or present as arranged, you must let your supervisor and the Research Director know immediately.
One thing is required:
Detailed, illustrated and public seminar/lecture to be delivered to an audience with relevant subject expertise. In the presentation, you will need to explicitly speak to:
- the originality of your project and its specific contribution to knowledge within a clearly identified and delineated field of enquiry;
- the key challenges and/or risks associated with the project going forward, and
- a reflection on what might be the broader cultural, social or political significance of your project beyond the academy.
Thesis Format
Generic guidance on thesis format can be found under the Doctoral College Thesis Format guide.
Submission and viva
Details on processes, including Notification of Intention to Submit, and Approval of Examination Arrangements (including internal and external examiners), can be found on the Doctoral College website:
Thesis requirements
A PhD must make a substantive, original contribution to knowledge, which is embodied within a research study which has both breadth of coverage (e.g. within the context of a literature review or a similar survey of practice) and depth of engagement with a particular problem/issue.
Please read Ulster University PhD Regulations for PhD thesis for further guidance.
In cases for which practice is involved, the length and format may vary. The following are indicative guidelines:
- Dissertation-only PhD (‘traditional’ form): university guidelines state the maximum word count to be 100,000 words
- Practice–led PhD (PhD in which practice forms a part of the investigatory process, which is examined for the most part through the dissertation): indicative word count 55,000–80,000 words, plus documentation of practice
- Practice–based PhD (PhD in which the major contribution is to be found in the portfolio of works, thematically related, illustrated by a supporting thesis): indicative word count 30,000-45,000 words, plus portfolio; see further discussion in PhD With Practice Guidelines
For practice-based PhDs, discussions about the nature and scale of the practice, and the form which its documentation might take, should be discussed with your supervisory team at the earliest possible opportunity, in advance of the initial assessment.
Publishing and your Research Profile
PURE is an online research portal available to all academic and research staff and PhD researchers at Ulster. Your PURE profile is created automatically when you join the University. You can login to your PURE profile via PURE Support.
PhD Researchers can manage their individual profile by recording research outcomes such as:
- Research Outputs and Publications
- Activities
- Press and Media
- Datasets
- Impacts